No aliases recorded.
Documents and descriptions supplied by archive contributors. All submissions are reviewed in accordance with our Terms and Conditions.
No user-contributed documents have been approved for this vessel yet. Use the forms below to contribute images or documents relating to this vessel.
Help complete the archive
Contribute photographs of Meuse to the archive for editorial review. Submissions remain private and will only be published following approval by an administrator.
How your photograph will be credited
Exterior · 1940 · Copyright © Example Contributor
Source: Copyright ownership confirmed at submission by Example Contributor.
This example uses the photograph group, year and copyright-holder name supplied in the form. Your own details will replace the example above when an approved image is published.
Already have an account? Log in before uploading to link new photographs immediately.
Help complete the archive
Share documents or images relating to Meuse for editorial review. Upload up to 12 PDF, JPG, PNG or WebP files per submission, with a maximum size of 20 MB each. Your submission remains private and will only be published following approval by an administrator.
How your document will be credited
Example Document Title · Contributed by Example Contributor
Source: Archive reference supplied by Example Contributor.
This example uses the document title, contributor name and source or archive reference supplied in the form. Your own details will replace the example above when an approved document is published.
0 potential matching records have currently been identified.
Further indexing may identify vessel particulars, reported movements, participation assessments, named personnel and source references. The absence of a current match does not establish that no relevant source exists.
We are compiling and checking transcriptions, metadata, vessel-name matches, source references and reuse permissions before publishing further detail. This work helps prevent incomplete OCR, historic spelling variations or unverified associations from being presented as established fact.
Account registrations and access to these developing records are temporarily unavailable. Existing account holders may log in, and everyone can join the newsletter for publication updates.
0 potential matching records have currently been identified.
Further indexing may identify service-list entries, vessel metadata, source-page references and protected full-size document images. The absence of a current match does not establish that no relevant source exists.
We are compiling and checking transcriptions, metadata, vessel-name matches, source references and reuse permissions before publishing further detail. This work helps prevent incomplete OCR, historic spelling variations or unverified associations from being presented as established fact.
Account registrations and access to these developing records are temporarily unavailable. Existing account holders may log in, and everyone can join the newsletter for publication updates.
No Small Craft records.
0 potential matching records have currently been identified.
Further indexing may identify OCR text matches, source files, page references and digitised page imagery. The absence of a current match does not establish that no relevant source exists.
We are compiling and checking transcriptions, metadata, vessel-name matches, source references and reuse permissions before publishing further detail. This work helps prevent incomplete OCR, historic spelling variations or unverified associations from being presented as established fact.
Account registrations and access to these developing records are temporarily unavailable. Existing account holders may log in, and everyone can join the newsletter for publication updates.
These details have been aggregated from multiple sources and may include contemporary records, later recollections, claims or assertions for which no corroborating evidence has been identified. Inclusion does not establish that any account or assertion is accurate. The information may be incomplete, out of date, disputed or incorrect and should be checked against the underlying source records and independent evidence before being relied upon.
Source: Lloyd’s Register Foundation, Heritage & Education Centre, Lloyd’s Register of Yachts 1939, digitised via Internet Archive. Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Images have been converted, resized and watermarked for web display; machine-generated table OCR has been added.
No Lloyd’s records.
Imaged document collections containing pages whose OCR text or table data has been tagged with the name Meuse. Open a collection to view the page images and transcriptions.
Source: Lloyd’s Register Foundation, Heritage & Education Centre, Lloyd’s Register of Yachts 1939, digitised via Internet Archive. Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Images have been converted, resized and watermarked for web display; machine-generated table OCR has been added.
| 569 PLAIN KATE M.SLP E. BURROWS. | 570 PANSY. YWL. LTCOL W BOWRING, M.B.E., V.D. | 571 G ALAI II SLP. JUAN DE GANDARIAS LAU II. SLP. JOSÉ GANDARIAS | $72 G FOLERPA. LUG. G.G. GARRA RASILLA | 573 T QUETZAL CUT. R.C.A. THOMPSON. | 574 J P GIRUNDIA II.SCH. PIERRE DUPUY. | 575 ALMÉE KCH. J.R. MICHEZ DE MEUSE. | 576 ARAS. M.SCH. H.J. CHISHOLM. |
| Ailsa | Cut. | A. C. Lovesy | 943 | de Meuse | 575 | Armyonde | Ywl. | Dr. R. Emperaire | 678 |
| Michez de Meuse, J. R., | m. Mary Rose 5 | Miller, Major Harvey, | m. Estroma 33 | Mtr. m. Aquarine 55 |
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
JESUS FLAGELLE (B.1853) French M.F.V. 4th June 0900 The Jesus Flagelle disembarked at Ramsgate about 90 French troops May 1335 and about 8 French sailors. (1) the Total 98 Disembarked 12 in England. (2) (1) (1) Ramagate report states that the Meuse, B.1853, H.81 and LHWD disembarked 354 Allied troops and 33 French sailors. (2) 91
MADELEINE CAMILLE (H.81) Belgian trawler Reported by D. Geselle, Belgian telegraphist "We saved 350 soldiers at Dunkirk". From Ramsgate report: 4th June 0900 354 B.E.F. and 33 French sailors were landed by the following 4 vessels: B.1853, H.81, L.H.W.D., E and the Meuse. (Estimated) Total 90 Authority - C.W. 26612/41. La Madeleine Camille with 3 french naval latings on board in a convoy commanded by Ensergued various DuvaR, landed 173 troops in England (hate by bat bras of french Phystomal Dept) 216
| Not say | 1000 X 8,2, address 3003 |
| Brites for Duakies 3500ca S craim) contranced 11 trupps by 132 larger TRANSL Properied 50 the gold, NAMMERS about 200 $torps implesing n Phone were the list to Yes | |
| Discrime WE now 2230am Procered. bested 100% | |
| 3st June | 1030ms W VALUE |
| AMOUNT Repuired engine. Ordered to Portations. |
SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 17 OCTOBER, 1941 5909
the Belgian Government were wedded. The Both these plans were worked out in the
French authorities were never in a position to greatest detail, and orders and instructions
obtain reliable and accurate details of the plans kept up to date as new divisions arrived and
of the Belgian General Staff for the defence of the role of divisions changed.
their country in the event of an invasion by The Escaut plan was by far the simpler of
Germany; staff conversations were out of the the two; it involved sending armoured car
question, yet plans had to be framed in such a reconnaissances to the river Dendre to be
way that they could be put into instant opera- relieved by divisional cavalry, who were later,
tion in the event of Belgium asking for military if necessary, to fight a delaying action back-
assistance from France or Great Britain when wards to the Escaut; demolitions were provided
invasion had taken place or was imminent. for on both rivers; for the remainder of the
Such slender contact as existed between the force, however, the advance appeared likely
British and Belgian Military authorities was to be an easy one, well within a day's march
maintained through the Military Attach^ at His on foot. The Dyle plan, on the other hand,
Majesty's Embassy at Brussels and General involved an advance of some sixty miles, carried
Van Overstraeten, Military Adviser to the King out at a time when every moment was of value
of the Belgians. over roads not previously reconnoitred, perhaps
crowded with refugees moving counter to the
15. Three alternative plans were decided on allied armies. Much, too, depended on the
by the French High Command during October resistance which the Belgians, and perhaps the
and November 1939, and I had agreed with Dutch, were able to offer to the enemy, who at
General Georges on the part to be played in such a time would certainly be making every
each of them by the B.E.F. effort to pierce the line of the Meuse and the
Albert Canal.
The first alternative was to occupy the frontier
defences, pushing forward mobile troops to the 16. The plans made in advance for the advance
line of the Escaut, while the French 7th Army to the Dyle position actually worked to schedule
on my left were to delay the enemy on the line in almost all respects. It may therefore be
of the Messines Ridge and the Yser Canal. convenient to summarise them here.
This plan was soon discarded in favour of the
second alternative, which was to secure and The Allied forces were to advance to the line
hold the line of the Escaut itself, from the point Namur—Wavre—Louvain—Antwerp, of which
at which it crosses the frontier at Maulde the B.E.F. Sector extended from Wavre to
northwards to the neighbourhood of Ghent Louvain, both inclusive. On our right was to
where it was intended to effect a junction with be the French ist Army (General d'Armee
Belgian forces. Blanchard) under whose command was the
French Cavalry Corps, and whose task it was
Later, however, as information became avail- to delay the arrival of the enemy on the Dyle
able regarding the defences of the Belgian Army, position and to block with its main forces the
* and its readiness for war, the French High Gembloux gap, with the Cavalry Corps pushed
Command formed the opinion that it would be forward to the line Eghezee (8 miles north of
safe to count on the Belgian defence holding Namur)—Tirlemont. On our left the French
out for some days oh the Eastern frontier, and 7th Army (General d'Armee Giraud) was to
the Albert Canal. It was also ascertained that advance to the general area Antwerp-Ghent,
the Belgians were preparing a de Cointet anti- with the object of supporting Belgian resistance
tank obstacle running southwards from Wavre north of Louvain. The plans of this Army
towards Namur. included a possible advance into Holland as
The line of the river Dyle was from the military far as the line Turnhout-Breda, and this was
point of view a better one than that of the Escaut. actually carried out. It had been ascertained
It was shorter, it afforded greater depth and its that a portion of the Belgian Army, if forced to
northern portion was inundated. In addition, withdraw from their frontier defences would
it represented smaller enemy occupation of come into line on the left of the B.E.F. on the
Belgian territory. general line from Louvain exclusive, thence
northward to the fortified area of Antwerp,
On the other hand, it involved the B.E.F. known as the National Redoubt.
in a forward move of some sixty miles against
time, while it also necessitated the holding by The British front was to be occupied initially
the French on our right of the Gembloux gap with ist Corps (Lieutenant-General M. G. H.
which contains no natural anti-tank obstacle. Barker, who had recently taken over command
This plan was twice discussed by General Georges from General Sir John Dill), on a two-division
with me on I3th October at my headquarters front, on the right, and 2nd Corps (Lieutenant-
at Le Cauroy and again on i6th November at General A. F. Brooke, now Sir Alan Brooke)
Folembray the headquarters of the French First on the left, on a front initially of one division.
Group of Armies; on this occasion there were The advance was to be made in four periods.
also present General Billotte, who commanded In the first, i2th Royal Lancers (Armoured
the Army Group, and Generals Blanchard and Cars) were to move to a general line some eight
Corap, Commanding the French ist and gth miles beyond the Dyle in observation of the
Armies. At this conference it was agreed that approaches from the east; they were to be
the frontage of the B.E.F. on the Dyle position relieved by cavalry regiments of ist and 2nd
was to be from Wavre to Louvain, both places Corps when they arrived.
inclusive, and a formal instruction to this effect Behind them were to come, from right to left,
was issued to me by General Georges on the 2nd Division (Major-General H. C. Loyd) and
following day. From this time onward, Com- ist Division (Major-General Hon. H. R. L. G.
manders and Staffs were studying simultaneously Alexander) of ist Corps, and 3rd Division
two alternative plans for advances to the Dyle (Maj01-General B. L. Montgomery) of 2nd
or the Escaut; these became known as plans Corps. The whole of the move of these three
DandE. divisions was to be made by motor transport,
SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 17 OCTOBER, 1941
and troop carrying companies were allotted to OPERATIONS—FIRST PHASE
Corps in such a way as to complete the move (ioth-i6th MAY)
in 90 hours. Belgium calls on Allies for assistance: advance
At the same time 44th Division was to march to the River Dyle by British and French
to an area north-west of Audenarde, with a Armies: the Belgian anti-tank obstacle is
view to organising the defence of the Escaut in found to be sited further forward than had
this area. been expected. The enemy penetrates the front
Movement in the first phase was to be con- of French gth Army and crosses the Meuse.
tinuous by day and night. The French had Action by Royal Air Force. General Billotte
decided to restrict the movements of their main appointed to co-ordinate action of British,
bodies to the hours of darkness, but I judged French and Belgians. The Dutch lay down
the time factor to be of paramount importance arms.
and accepted the risk that our air support might loth May—The enemy invades Holland and
be insufficient to prevent enemy interference Belgium.
with the move. Events proved that the risk
was justifiable. 18. The tension which had been increasing
during April had lessened somewhat during the
In the second period, to be completed by the early days of May; during this period I had
end of the sixth day, 48th Division (Major- received reports of enemy activity from several
General A. F. A. N. Thorne) and 4th Division sources of varying degrees of reliability, culmin-
(Major-General D. G. Johnson, V.C.) were to ating in a report from the Hague, but it was not
move by march route and motor transport into until the night of 9th-ioth May that information
ist and 2nd Corps reserve respectively, while was received of exceptional activity on the
ist Army Tank Brigade consisting of two frontiers of Luxembourg, Belgium and Holland.
battalions was to move chiefly by rail into The weather was set fair, and with the exception
ist Corps area. of some heavy thunderstorms which had no
The third period was to be completed by the effect on operations, remained so to the end of
tenth day, and included the movement of soth the month. At about 4.30 a.m. on loth May,
Division to 2nd Corps reserve, while 4th Division enemy aircraft appeared over my headquarters
moved into the line on the right of 3rd Division. at Arras and bombs were dropped on aero-
The fourth period included the forward dromes hi the neighbourhood and on a number
movement of 3rd Corps. 5th Division (Major- of towns including Doullens and Abbeville.
General H. E. Franklyn) was to move to At 5.30 a.m., a message was received from my
positions in G.H.Q. reserve, along the river mission with General Georges ordering " Alertes
Dendre, north and south of Grammont; 42nd i, 2 and 3," namely, instant readiness to move
and 44th Divisions to the line of the river into Belgium. I at once sought, and obtained,
Escaut around Tournai and to the south of the release of the 5th Division from War Office
Audenarde respectively, to organise bridgehead reserve, and henceforward it was employed
positions pending orders for a further advance. under my orders. At about 6.15 a.m. I received
instructions to put Plan D into effect.
Detailed instructions had also been issued It was ascertained that I2th Royal Lancers
for the preparation of defences on the three could be ready to cross the frontier at i p.m.,
river lines of the Dyle, Dendre and Escaut, as and accordingly I laid down this time as zero
also for the necessary demolitions and inunda- hour.
tions. Special arrangements had been made
for the control of traffic, including refugees for At i p.m. I opened my command post at
whom routes had been allotted; definite bodies Wahagnies, midway between Douai and Lille.
of troops were detailed for these tasks. ist and 2nd Corps experienced some delay
in moving, due largely to the fact that owing
to the short notice received, preliminary moves
The Belgian Anti-Tank obstacle of transport had not taken place; apart from
17. Late in April and early in May, I received this, moves on this day proceeded according to
reports regarding the siting of the Belgian plan; very little interference was experienced
anti-tank obstacle; it appeared that, without either from enemy aircrait or refugees and
informing either the French High Command or i2th Lancers reached the Dyle unopposed at
myself, they had sited the obstacle much 10.30 p.m.
further to the east than had originally been The French armies on our light and left were
planned, namely on the line Namur-Perwez- reported as advancing on time.
Louvain: furthermore the obstacle was not The Belgian population received the allied
as yet by any means completed. The matter armies in the most cordial manner, and in
was discussed with General Georges. particular the leading troops were loudly cheered.
On the British front, the river Dyle was so
far superior as an anti-tank obstacle to any Operations between nth and i$th May.
artificial work further east which the Belgians 19. On nth May, enemy air action increased
might be preparing that I had no hesitation in somewhat, but did not interfere with the forward
urging adherence to the existing plan for the movement of troops, and during the afternoon
defence of the Dyle position. and evening, the leading infantry brigades
On the front of the French ist Army the reached the Dyle, refugee traffic being
situation was different: the absence of a natural handled successfully. The original arrange-
obstacle forced them to rely on.that prepared ments, of which the Belgian Government were
by the Belgians. To clear the matter up, aware, included the use by the B.E.F. of roads
information was demanded as to the true site 'passing through the northern and southern
of the artificial obstacle. These negotiations outskirts of Brussels, but not through the
were begun through our Military Attache1 on centre of the city. A series of requests was
8th May, but they were not destined to be however received to discontinue the use of these
concluded. roads on the ground that Brussels had been
SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 17 OCTOBER, 1941
declared an open town and that British troop Air Force to impede the enemy advance; but
movements would prejudice its safety, but no such opportunities were of a fleeting character,
adequate alternative routes to the Dyle were since the enemy established strong anti-aircraft
available and I was therefore compelled to defences soon after his arrival, particularly in
adhere to the original plan of using the outskirts towns at which roads converged. Tactical
of the city. reconnaissance became virtually impossible
The 3rd Division, on arrival, reported that a without fighter support, and the demands made
Belgian division was holding the bridgehead at on the fighter group of the Air Component were
Louvain, although I had assumed that this extremely heavy. They had been met with
should be a British responsibility. 2nd Corps unfailing skill and courage, and with marked
therefore took up a narrow front on their right success, but by now the group was reduced to
with a strong reserve in rear of Louvain. some 50 aircraft, and although I had asked for
5th Division, which was training in the area four fresh squadrons from home, only one had
south-west of Amiens, was ordered to proceed arrived. In three days' operations, the British
by march route so as to shorten the move by Air Force in France had firm reports of the
motor transport in a later phase, and later destruction of 101 enemy aircraft, mostly
occupied a position on the Senne. fighters, against a loss of 78 of our own.
The news from the Belgian army, of which That afternoon a conference was held at the
King Leopold had assumed command on the Chateau Casteau, near Mons which was attended
outbreak of war, was not good. Belgian cyclist by the King of the Belgians, General Van
troops from east of the Meuse were falling back Overstraeten, M. Daladier, Generals Georges
on Huy. At Maastricht, it was reported that and Billotte, and my Chief of the General Staff
they had been forestalled by enemy action from (Lieutenant-General H. R. Pownall), as my
the rear and had been unable to demolish representative in my absence. The primary
important bridges over the : Albert Canal and object of the conference was to achieve
the Meuse across which the enemy had some measure of co-ordination in the
begun to move. Air bombing was requested Belgian theatre of war. General Billotte's
and was extremely effective, but could not command included the French ist and
altogether deny the passage of the water 7th Armies, between which lay the Belgian
obstacles to the enemy. On my right the Army under the independent command
French Cavalry Corps had reached their of their King, and the B.fe.F. which, though
position on the line Huy—Hannut—Tirlemont under the command of General Georges, was not
and reconnoitred the Belgian anti-tank obstacle. under that of General Billotte. Whatever the
They reported that, as I had supposed, there nature of the operations, a common doctrine
was no effective obstacle on the Gembloux line was clearly necessary and when General Georges
and that the obstacle on the Perwez line was enquired if the King of the Belgians and I
not only unfinished but badly sited on a forward would be prepared to accept co-ordination by
slope. I thereupon conveyed to General Georges General Billotte as bis representative, General
a confirmation of my objections to pushing Pownall said he was sure that I would agree.
forward so as to make use of the obstacle in its The King of the Belgians likewise agreed.
unfinished state, notwithstanding the Belgians' . 21. On I3th May I moved my Command Post
anxiety that I should do so. Later that day I forward to Renaix; no event of major impor-
was informed that he had decided that the main tance occurred during the day, but some small
line of resistance was to be on the Gembloux infantry attacks developed on the British sector.
line as planned, but that the French were to These were easily held. Movements of the main
push out advanced troops to the line of the bodies of the French ist and 7th Annies con-
obstacle. He expressed the hope that the B.E.F. tinued in accordance with their plans, and units
would conform, and ist and 2nd Corps of the latter were by now north of Antwerp on
accordingly reconnoitred the anti-tank the Dutch border. It was, however, becoming
obstacles reported to exist round the forest of increasingly evident that they would be unable
Meerdael with a view to pushing forward to prevent the enemy occupation of Walcheren
detachments with anti-tank guns. They found and Zuid Beveland which was developing from
them complete only in places. the north-east.
20. The first phase of Plan D was successfully During the day and the following night the
completed by i2th May, and the French ist Belgian forces were in process of withdrawing
Army on my right then accelerated the pro- their northern forces to the general line Louvain-
gramme governing their forward movement by Antwerp, and the Staff of the Belgian G.Q.G.
moving by day as well as by night. The enemy expressed concern lest the simultaneous with-
progress across the Albert Canal had up to now drawal of their Cavalry Corps and that of the
been relatively small, due to a successful French, north-west and south-west from their
counter-attack by the French Cavalry Corps at junction point at Tirlemont, would create a gap.
St. Trend, but larger concentrations were now There appeared to me to be little danger, but
reported north of the Albert Canal. Disquieting nevertheless I ordered I2th Lancers to watch
news was received from the Ardennes, where a the situation, assisted if need be by divisional
German thrust was reported as developing on cavalry regiments.
the front of the French gth Army, with at least 22. On I4th May I went to Brussels, where at
two armoured divisions. 12 noon I met the Commanders of ist and 2nd
On this date I requested the War Office to Corps at the British Embassy. The Commander
expedite the despatch of the ist Armoured of 2nd Corps reported that the Belgian ist
Division to the greatest extent possible. I also Corps was now reforming in 4th Division
asked that they should be shipped to the nearest' area. I also discussed the organisation of the
available port and loaded tactically with a view second position on the Senne canal and of a
to operations as soon as possible after landing. Corps reserve line east of Brussels. 5th and 48th
The day was one of great activity in the air, Divisions were ordered to reconnoitre the Senne
and afforded great opportunities for the Royal position on I5th May. That afternoon at 3 p.m.
SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 17. OCTOBER/1941 "59*5
The enemy had, during the previous day, the abandonment of large quantities of equip-
penetrated as far as Amiens, and rail communica- ment. It would obviously be unwelcome to
tion with the bases was severed' at that'point. the Belgians who would be faced with the
'Communications by road and rail over the alternatives of withdrawing with us and aban-
Sorrime at Abbeville were still holding on igth doning Belgian soil, fighting on a perimeter of
May and the town was being placed in a state their own, or seeking an armistice.
of defence with such resources as were available, So far as I am aware, the French High
mainly, units of I2th Division. However, there Command had never suggested such a move-
was little doubt that enemy armoured forces ment up to that date and it is doubtful whether
in'that area, which at the time I estimated at even had they, decided on immediate withdrawal
five armoured divisions, would shortly break as soon as the French gth Army front on the
through to the coast. Meuse had been penetrated, there would ever
The force could then no longer be supplied have been sufficient time for the troops in the
through the ports south of the Somme, and the north to conform.
great bulk of the reserves, which were in the Thirdly there was the possibility of with-
rearward areas, would • shortly cease to be drawal north-westwards or northwards towards
available to the force for the purposes of main- the Channel ports, making use of the successive
tenance or replacement. Several days' reserve river and canal lines, and of holding a defensive
had, however, for some time past been maintained perimeter there, at any rate sufficiently long to
north of the Somme. enable the force to be withdrawn, preferably in
The prospect of securing the reinforcement of concert with the French and Belgians. I
the Armoured Division had likewise become realised that this course was in theory a last
remote/ I had been advised that two Armoured alternative, as it would involve the departure
Brigades, of this division would disembark at of the B.E.F. from the theatre of war at a time
Havre on i6th May, and were to concentrate at when the French might need all the support
Bolbec, and I had therefore sent instructions by which Britain could give them. It involved
the hand of a staff officer to the Commander the virtual certainty that even if the excellent
(Major-General R. Evans). He was to move the port facilities at Dunkirk continued to be
leading brigade on disembarkation with all available, it would be necessary to abandon
speed to secure, the crossings of the Somme west all the heavier guns and much of the vehicles
of Amiens, from Picquigny to Pont Remy, both and equipment. Nevertheless, I felt that in
inclusive, with a view to .the concentration of the the circumstances there might be no other
remaining -brigade behind the Somme and the course open to me. It was therefore only
move of his division to join the main body of prudent to consider what the adoption of such
the B.E.F. However, in the meantime, orders a plan might entail. On this day therefore at
had been issued locally to concentrate the about 1.30 p.m. the Chief of the General Staff
Division south of the Seine, and the plan to telephoned to the Director of Military Opera-
cross the Somme and join the B.E.F. proved tions and Plans at the War Office and discussed
impossible to execute. The division therefore this situation with him.
remained in the Lines of Communication Area
and never came under my effective command. The Position of the French ist Army and the
About midnight on the iSth/igth May, British right flank reinforced.
General Billotte came to see me, and gave me 31. The French ist Army had by igth May
an account of the situation as he saw it. He completed its withdrawal and was in touch
also told me of the measures which were being with the right of ist Corps. On the night of
taken to restore the situation on the front of i9/20th May they took up positions on the line
the French Qth Army, though clearly he had of the Escaut as far south as Bouchain ; but at
little hope that they would be effective. Reports that point, instead of continuing to hold that
from the liaison officers with French formations river towards Cambrai (which according to my
.were likewise not encouraging ; in particular information was not held in strength by the
I was unable to verify that the French had enemy) they had drawn back westwards along
enough reserves at their disposal south of the the river Sensee. Thus in the quadrilateral
gap to enable them to stage counter-attacks Maulde—Va-lenciennes—Arleux—Douai, some
sufficiently strong to warrant the expectation nineteen miles by ten, there was assembled the
that the gap would be closed. bulk of the French ist Army, amounting to
Thus, in my opinion, there was an imminent three Corps of two divisions and two divisions
danger of the forces in the north-eastern area, in reserve—a total of eight divisions. The
that is to say the French forces next to the sea, Commander of the French 3rd Corps, General
the Belgian Army, the B.E.F. and the bulk of de la Laurencie, remained that night in close
the French ist Army on our right, being touch with General Mason-MacFarlane, at the
irretrievably cut off from the main French headquarters of Macforce.
forces in the south. Further west the French Cavalry Corps was
There were three alternative courses of action assembling at Oppy, north-east of Arras.
open to the northern forces under General None of these forces were being seriously
Billotte : first, in the event of the gap being pressed at this stage, but since the enemy had
closed by successful counter-attacks made already penetrated, so deeply further south, I
simultaneously from north and south it would felt it necessary, without more delay, to
in theory be possible to maintain the line of the strengthen the dispositions for the defence of
Escaut, or at any rate the frontier defences, what had become the bastion of Arras. It was
and thence southwards on one or other of the also necessary to secure crossings westwards
canal lines. from the right of Macforce, along the line
Secondly, there was the possibility of a with- Carvin—La Basse"e.
drawal to the-line of the Somme as far as its I therefore ordered soth Division, then in
mouth. This plan had the attraction that we G.H.Q. reserve, to send one Infantry Brigade
should be falling back on our lines of communi- (25th) to take up positions on the Canal on the
cation and if it was successful would not entail line La Bassee—Carvin under the command of
5912 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 17 OCTOBER, 1941
I visited H.M. the King of the Belgians and By the night of i5th May the movements
General Van Overstraeten and reached agree- envisaged in Plan D were all running ahead of
ment that the Belgian ist Corps should be schedule. 4th Division was moving into Corps
withdrawn from the area of 2nd Corps and that reserve behind 3rd Division; 5th Division was
the left boundary of the B.E.F. should be moving on to the Senne in place of 5oth Division
adjusted so as to allow the Belgians the use of as originally planned, and the latter was now
the road Vilvorde-Alost for this purpose. I moving to G.H.Q. reserve along the River
also stressed the importance of having fresh Dendre.
Belgian troops established early in position
north of Louvain to continue the British line
covering Brussels.
Further serious news came from the south OPERATIONS—SECOND PHASE
where the enemy had crossed the Meuse between (i7th-26th MAY)
Sedan and Me"zieres, and further north he was
reported to be surrounding the fortress of St. Withdrawal to the Escaut decided on; the threat
Heribert (4 miles S.S.W. of Namur). to Arras and to the right flank; formation of
The French Cavalry Corps on my right had Macforce and deployment of 2yd Division on
on the previous day received orders to retire the Canal du Nord. The enemy reaches the
to the Perwez position whence they subsequently Somme and cuts communications with the Base ;
withdrew, according to plan, to the main position Calais and Boulogne invested: the admini-
running through Gembloux. strative position. The organisation of the Canal
line. Alternative lines discussed with French
At the request of Air Marshal Barratt I and Belgians, resulting in further withdrawal
placed at his disposal for use on the French from the Escaut to the Frontier defences and
front three squadrons of fighters which I had fresh plans for attacks southwards in conjunction
only recently received in response to an urgent with French main forces. $th and $oth Divisions
appeal to the Secretary of State for War. counter-attack on 21st May. A further attack
23. On 15th May the Dutch Army laid down in conjunction with French planned for
its arms; the immediate effect of this on the 26th May: this plan is abandoned owing to
operations of the B.E.F. was small, for the penetration of Belgian line on the Lys.
British forces operating in Holland had at no
time been under my command. I anticipated, The beginning of the withdrawal (ifith-T.'jth May)
however, that this would come as a shock to 24. By i6th May, it became clear that a
the Belgian Army. prolonged defence of the Dyle position was
The French 7th Army withdrew' its advanced impracticable. The French ist Army on my
formations to the neighbourhood of Antwerp right were unlikely to make good the ground
and on this day ordered divisions to move across lost' on the previous day, notwithstanding the
my rear to fill the gap created further south. support I had given them in the air and on the
This move, however, did not take place till ground, and a further withdrawal seemed likely
some three days later when it was accomplished, to be forced on them by events in the south.
thanks to efficient traffic control, with little On the other hand there had been no serious
delay to our own movements. attack on the Belgian positions on my left;
On this day (i5th May) I established a nevertheless, any withdrawal from our present
command post at Lennick St. Quentin, 6 miles positions would of necessity involve a withdrawal
west of Brussels. On the British front, the day by the Belgian Army in the course of which
passed quietly on the whole, ist Corps was not Brussels, and probably Antwerp also, would be
attacked in strength ; 3rd Division of 2nd Corps abandoned to the enemy.
was attacked north-west of Louvain and its Very early on i6th May therefore, I sent a
forward positions were penetrated, but a counter- representative to General Billotte who was
attack successfully restored the original line. co-ordinating the movements of the British,
There was considerable enemy bombing of French and Belgian Forces; I asked that, if
rearward areas during the day, and the movement he intended to withdraw, he should let me know
of refugees became increasingly difficult to the policy and the timings at once, especially
control. This was, in part, due to the bombing as the first bound back to the Senne canals
of Tournai and other towns on the routes and involved a march of some fifteen to twenty
to the French decision to close the frontier to miles.
pedestrian and horsed traffic. Despite my At about 10 a.m. I received from him orders
requests, made as early as loth May, the Belgian for a withdrawal to the Escaut, and for the
authorities had done nothing to restrict the use occupation of the positions along that fiver
of private motor cars or the sale of petrol. originally planned. The operation was to begin
During the day I received a request that I that night (16/17 May), one day being spent on
should take over part of the front held by the the Senne and one day on the Dendre positions ;
French division on my right. To meet this thus the Escaut would be reached on the night
request I placed under the orders of this division of 18/19 May, though the French orders did
a brigade of 48th Division ; this step proved not rule out the possibility of staying for longer
necessary since at about 6 p.m. the enemy had than one day on each bound.
penetrated the French front, thus threatening That evening, I held a co-ordinating con-
the right of 2nd Division. By this tune, how- ference at ist Corps Headquarters as a result
ever, 48th Division, less one brigade, was in of which I ordered 5th Division, which was on
position in ist Corps reserve behind 2nd the way to join 2nd Corps, to the line of the Senne
Division, and I agreed with the commander of in ist Corps reserve. Two brigades of 46th
ist Corps that the withdrawal of his right Division* which had been moved up from the
should take place to the River Lasne to join Lines of Communication for the protection of
up with the French left. This movement was
carried out on the night of the 15/16 May, * One of the three divisions sent to France for
closely followed by the enemy. pioneer duties.
Source: The National Archives, Kew, ADM 199 788 A. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
| 0900 | Meuse |
Source: The National Archives, Kew, ADM 199 792. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Page 3.
OF SHIPS WHICH TOOK PART IN OPERATION "DYNAMO" - 26TH MAY - 4TH JUNE, 1940
PART I - BRITISH SHIPS (continued)
PORTSMOUTH A/P YACHTS
AHOLA
CARYANDA
NONETA
ANLAH
EILA II
SERIOLA
ANKH
LAHLOO
THELE
BOUNTY
MASAYRU
MISCELLANEOUS H.M. SHIPS (small craft)
A.L.C. 5
GREY MIST (Dan-laying
A.L.C. 15
Vessel)
-
A.L.C. 16
# GRIVE (F.A.A. Yacht)
A.L.C. 17
KINDRED STAR (Drifter)
ALOUETTE II
# KING ORRY (Armed Boarding
(Echo Sounding Yacht)
Vessel)
# AMULREE (Harbour Defence
LLANTHONY (Examination
Patrol Craft)
Service Vessel)
ARONIA (Yacht)
LORMONT (Armed Boarding
BEN AND LUCY (Drifter)
Vessel)
BLUEBIRD (M.B.)
MONARDA (Drifter)
BYSTANDER
MONA'S ISLE (Armed Boarding
(Echo Sounding Yacht)
Vessel)
CALETA (Harbour Defence
ST. OLAVES (Rescue Tug)
Patrol Craft)
TARRET (A/S Yacht)
CHRYSTOBEL II (Harbour
THRIFTY (Drifter)
Defence Patrol Craft )
V. 4 ("Vernon' s" pinnace)
"DOLPHIN'S" MOTOR-BOAT
VELIA (Armed Trawler)
EVELYN ROSE Trawler)
VERNON I
"EXCELLENT'S" A/A MOTOR-BOAT
VIVIANA (A/S Trawler)
GAVA (Trawler)
Ambleve.
Escaut.
transferred
GLALA (Harbour Defence Patrol
Meuse.
from
Craft)
Sambre.
Semoise.
page 9.
yser.
DUTCH SKOOTS (Commissioned with Naval Crews)
ABEL TASMAN
DOGGERSBANK
PACIFIC
PASCHOLL
AEGIR
FREDANJA
PATRIA
ALICE
FRISCO
PRINCESS JULIANA
AMAZONE
GORECHT
REIGER
ANTJE
HEBE
RIKA
ATLANTIC
HILDA
RUJA
BART
HONDSRUG
BORNRIF
HORST (Abandoned)
SAN ANTONIO
SURSUM CORDA
BRANDARIS
JAVA
TILLY
CARIBIA
JUTLAND
TINY
DELTA
KAAPFALGA
TUNG
DEMOK I
LENA
TWENTE
DENEB
ORANJE
VREDE
DESPATCH II
ORANGE YREESWIJH
ZEUS
(Continued)
# Sunk
| TIER | X MEUSE (Belgian Launch) | ing |
Source: The National Archives, Kew, ADM 199 795. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
- 2 - 11. A/P 29th Trawlers CARBINEER II, KASTORIA and paid off on August 1940 on lapse of T 124 agreements NAMUR (M. 06221/40). IMMEDIATE. Serial No. 610. 12. SECRET. No Rye in the his title has now been amended to Club, S.L. Willis and has taken up his Headquarters in (Commander) The R.N.O. Hastings, Vice Admiral SPECIAL SECRET BRANCH ACQUAINT. The following information is circulated for guidance change area covered by this R.N.O. is R.N.O. involved. and for such action within each Admiralty Department as may be (M. 016366/40). necessary. 62 13. N.O. i/c Haifa as patrol craft on Palestine Coast:- The following police launches have been commission G.Britow for Head of Military Branch. MOQITA SEALION 19th September, 1940. SEAWOLF SHARK HAWK EAGLE. 1. Correspondence to Naval authorities in the Shetlands. All will be borne nominally on books of STAG. In connection with the distribution of copies of (M. 017235/40). Admiralty letters of a General nature regarding anti-invasion that 14. R/S 61 need be Messages have recently been addressed by Admiral ck and Departments to V.A.A. in error and attention is therefore Secretary is to S.S.B.A. No. 583 (28) which states that the appointment 18 SEP 1940 M.r.C. Poole. Admiral Aircraft Carriers has lapsed. 4th June (M. 015837/40). 940 19 SEP 1940 rol to 15. With reference to S.S.B.A. No. 585 (11), trawler has been allocated to Brigham and Cowan, S. Shields, for Head of Military Branch. h July 1 mof uties at to Oropesa Minesweeper. Winch, gallows and fair-leads are The Secretary to did provided if available from those removed from converted trs Naval Officer-in-Charge, Poole. 4 C luly, Approval has been given for trawler LADY LOVE to 19th September, 1940 M.010027/40 (owner inder requisitioned, if suitable, for Oropesa M/S in place of tre been BAHAMA which has been found unsuitable Dutch coaster AEGIR paid off at Poole. is AEGIR (M. 016433/40). It is understood from the The Base accountant organization at Aden is short Director of Sea Transport that the 0. ELGICA 8 16. E GEZUST centralised ashore. H.M.S. LUCIA will be an independent CO naval crew did not leave the Dutch state up as with accounts in SHEBA. Coaster till 4th July, 1940 L by Belg I 1 THE all SHEBA will also carry accounts of base staff, HUN Portsmouth that DERBY, CHANTALA, CHAKDINA, SAGITTA, MOONSTONE, PLANET, Ade Poole on 28th June, 1940. enger LAOMEDON (on commissioning). Station, KANDAHAR, KIMBERLEY, KINGSTON, AMBER, BURGONET and It is requested that you will 8 Accounts of FLAMINGO, GRIMSBY and AUCKLAND are state whather Ansibility tillad an state lty reaponsibility titud 4th ach MEUSE that carried on board. it into a Care and Maintenance H.M.S. LUCIA will act as repair ship and provide remained on board after 28th June, accommodation for personnel waiting passage etc. 1940. 1 over to The change will take effect as soon as accommodatal on ready and necessary personnel arrive. (Sga.) E w. austin (M. 015284/40). 17. With reference to S.S.B.A. No. 550 (1), the follow for Head of Military Branch. trawlers are expected to commission on dates shown:- SILANION VIKING DEEPS SABINA 11th September, 1940. and 3rd - STRATHELLA 11th September, 1940. - DOROTHY GRAY 4th September, 1940. - 4th September, 1940. 11. TRITELIA - 4th September, 1940. (M. 013761/40). 'rculation as for Special Secret Branch Acquaint No.
| carried on Accounts board. of FLAMINGO, accommodation for LUCIA | IIIW UOV, tedd ne AID IIIS | the | remained | on board often | 7M | unch MEUSE put into |
- 2 - paid off on A/P 29th Trawlers August CARBINEER 1940 on lapse II, KASTORIA of T 124 and agreements NAMUR (M. 06221/40). IMMEDIATE. Serial No. 610. SECRET. Club, L. Willis Rye and The has R.N.O. his taken title Hastings, up has his Headquarters Vice Admiral in (Commander) SPECIAL SECRET BRANCH ACQUAINT. To change in the area covered now by been this amended R.N.O. is to R.N.O., involved. The following information is circulated for guidance and for such action within each Admiralty Department as may be (M. 016366/40). necessary. 62 .0. i/c Haifa The following as patrol police craft on launches Palestine have been commist G.Britow for Head of Military Branch. MOQITA SEALION 19th September, 1940. SEAWOLF SHARK HAWK EAGLE. 1. Correspondence to Naval authorities in the Shetlands. All will be borne nominally on books of STAG. In connection with the distribution of copies of (M. 017235/40). Admiralty letters of a General nature regarding anti-invasion measures, the Secretary to F.O.C. Shetlands has stated that epartm such Admiralty circular letters of general application need be S.S. sent to F.O.C. Shetlands only and not to N.O. i/c Lerwick and imiral R.N.O. Sullom Voe. (M. 014684/40). Whale Catcher ORNEN III was commissioned on 24th June 2. 1940 as a tender to MALABAR II for minesweeping and patrol duties at Trinidad. (M. 018275/40). beer Orope Catcher THORVARD was commissioned on 9th July 1° ovided 3. as a tender Whale to MALABAR II for minesweeping and patrol duties at (M. 018274/40). Trinidad. quisit has been approved to requisition M/B DANDY under (owner WILL 4. Sergeant J. It Cumming) for Air Rescue work at Herne Bay supervision of R.N.O. Whitstable. (M. 016623/40). 5. Belgian (H 62: & different vessel from be DE taken DRIE up as M/F.V's LEOPOLD NERA, ANNA LEOPOED, BELGICA GEZUST a: acc DE DRIE GEZUSTERS 540 (8)) manned by Poles) are to manned by tenders (S.S.B.A. to No. observation minelayers. They will be Belg (M. 017640/40). CH crews. MEDON 6. Boat LERINA at Appledore for A/P (4. duties. 016300/40). Approval has been given to take up Motor Passenger 01 S.S.B.A. No. 554 (7) Passenger but Launch put into MEUSE ommodat 7. commissioned Reference for the Dunkirk Operations, was service not with civilian crew. (M. 010027/40). and Chasseurs 23 and 25 were turned 24 over to 8. Free French Wooden Navy French on 9th September 1940, and Chasseur on (M. 012992/40). 16th September 1940. lers ai 9. M.L. 119 commissioned on 18th September 1940. (M. 013007/40). (3)) and and SILANION 3rd 10. August equisit AHAMA September (S.S.B.A. 1940 W 11. CH
Source: The National Archives, Kew, ADM 234 360. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
CONTENTS Page Introduction xiii CHAPTER I Preliminary Events, 10th to 18th May, 1940 Germany invades Holland and Belgium 1 Allies reach River Dyle 1 German thrust on French 9th Army front 1 Occupation of Walcheren and Zuid Beveland imminent 2 Germans cross Meuse 2 Dutch Army surrenders 2 Allies withdraw to River Escaut 2 French 9th Army front broken 3 Allied rail communications severed 3 CHAPTER II The week before Operation "Dynamo", 19th to 25th May, 1940 Compulsory withdrawal of B.E.F. foreseen 4 ... R.A.F. Component begins return to England 4 ... Vice-Admiral Dover, represented at War Office Conference 4 Channel ports the German objective 4 Gerneral Weygand directing Allied operations 5 R.A.F. Component to set up rear H.Q. at Hawkinge 5 Naval Staff at Dover considers large scale evacuation 5 Provision of small craft considered 5 Counter-attack south of Arras 6 Germans approach Boulogne 6 Organisation of the canal line 7 Emergency evacuation again considered at the War Office 7 Canal line occupied 7 Boulogne cut off, Calais threatened 7 "The Operation will be known as 'Dynamo' " 7 Enemy within 20 miles of Dunkirk 8 Calais cut off 8 i
RESTRICTED CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY EVENTS 10TH-18TH MAY 1940 (See Plan 1) 10TH MAY Germany Invades Holland and Belgium On the 10th May, following the invasion of Holland and Belgium, the Franco- British forces under General Georges, commanding the French Front of the North East, crossed the Belgian frontier and began their advance to the River Dyle,¹ according to plan. 11TH MAY Allies reach River Dyle During the afternoon and evening of the 11th May the leading infantry brigades reached the Dyle. The news from the Belgian Army, of which King Leopold had assumed command on the outbreak of war, was not good. At Maastricht the Belgians had been unable to demolish important bridges over the Albert Canal and the river Meuse, and the enemy had begun to move across them; whilst the Belgian anti-tank obstacle eastward had been reconnoitred by the French Cavalry Corps and found to be not only badly sited but unfinished.² 12TH MAY German thrust on French 9th Army Front The Allied advance to the Dyle was successfully completed by the 12th May. The B.E.F. was in position between Wavre and Louvain, with the French 7th Army (General Giraud) on its left and the French 1st Army (General Blanchard) on its right. On the right of the French 1st Army was the French 9th Army (General Corap) of the French Southern Command. Disquieting news was, however, received from the south, where a German thrust with at least two armoured divisions¹ was reported as developing on the front of the French 9th Army. This thrust eventually proved to be the beginning of the German break- through and their sweep westward, which cut off the Allied northern forces from the main French forces in the south, led to the capture of Boulogne and Calais, and culminated in the evacuation of Dunkirk. General Billotte was in command of the French First Group of Armies, which included the French 1st Army (with the French Cavalry Corps), and the French 7th Army. Between these two armies lay the Belgian Army (under the independent command of their King), and the B.E.F., which, though under the command of General Georges, was not under that of General Billotte. On this day, however, it was agreed to co-ordinate the action of the British, French and Belgian forces, and General Billotte was appointed to perform this task.³ I Lord Gort's Second Despatch, para. 18. 2 Lord Gort's Second Despatch, para. 19. 3 Lord Gort's Second Despatch para. 22. 1
THE EVACUATION FROM DUNKIRK CHAP. I 13TH MAY Occupation of Walcheren and Zuid Beveland imminent in accordance with their plans, and by the May, units of the latter Movements of the main bodies of the French 13th Ist and 7th Armies continued north of Antwerp on the Dutch border. It was, however, becoming in- of Walcheren and Zuid Beveland, which was developing from the north-east. creasingly evident that they would be unable to prevent the enemy occupation northern forces to the general line Louvain-Antwerp. During the day and the following night the Belgians were withdrawing their 14TH MAY Germans cross Meuse May the 14th was crucial, for on that day the enemy penetrated the French 9th Army front, and crossed the Meuse between Sedan and Mézières.¹ (See Plan 1). 15TH MAY Dutch Army surrenders On the 15th May the Dutch Army laid down its arms. The immediate effect of this on the operations of the B.E.F. was small, but "I anticipated says Lord Gort, "that this would come as a shock to the Belgian Army".2 The French 7th Army withdrew its advanced formations to the neighbour- hood of Antwerp, and the French divisions on the B.E.F.'s left flank were ordered to move across the British rear to fill the gap which had been created on the French 9th Army's front. This move did not, however, actually take place till some 3 days later,² and it then left the Belgian Army responsible for the security of the British left flank. On the British front the day passed quietly on the whole. The 1st Corps [Lt.-Gen. M. G. H. Barker] was not attacked in strength; 3rd Division [Maj.- Gen. B. L. Montgomery] of 2nd Corps [Lt.-Gen. A. F. Brooke] was attacked north-west of Louvain, and its forward positions were penetrated, but a counter- attack successfully restored the original line. and, in spite of British support, some ground was lost. At about 1800, however, the enemy penetrated the French 1st Army's front, 16TH MAY Allies withdraw to river Escaut was were impracticable,3 because the French 1st the B.E.F.'s right flank By the 16th May it became clear that a prolonged defence of the Dyle position withdrawal unlikely to make good the ground lost on Army the on and a further It seemed likely to be forced on them by events previous in day the south.³ on night of Senne and one day on the River Escaut, spending on the the was River therefore decided to withdraw to the River one day began. 16th-17th May, the 15 to 20 miles withdrawal Dendre. to Accordingly, the Senne positions 2 1 Lord Lord Gort's Second Despatch 2 Lord Gort's Second Despatch, para. 22. Gort's Second Despatch, para. para. 23. 24. 2
THE EVACUATION FROM DUNKIRK CHAP. XI The Admiralty had already continued (2312/2) for the undertaken evacuation that ships would be night the evacuation 3rd to 4th on June, this and night. they To this the French agreed. complete on the vided and air protection now urged the French of Admiralty trops pro- Plan for the night embarkation, the hours of 2230/3 and with such ships for For this last and night the maximum it was decided effort to was cut to down be made, by one hour the time mained available, between to be made by personnel 0230/4. From the as re- Pier, liftings were to be sent to the entire vessels, destroyers, and East minesweepers; be ships received, were and it was estimated that length of the pier as paddle as they could Drifters and fast thus be provided and for docks 14,000 of men. the inner harbour. small craft were to go would up to the quays be French ships, for which right latter pier the remaining would also lift ships (minesweepers the other than paddle, the beach, the Quai Félix Faure, British Avant Port (West Pier) ; from numbers could be estimated, were and the to New responsible for evacuation from Malo no boats. Locust was to remain loads ferried out to her by small vettes and skoots) outside and troops, receive to number of 5,000. The gunboat cor- It was intended to employ on the work a force of 9 personnel vessels, 9 destroyers (all that were available), 4 paddle minesweepers, 7 fleet minesweepers, 9 drifters, the Locust, 2 corvettes, 4 French torpedo boats, and a number of organised motor boats flotillas including lifeboats from Ramsgate and Dover, together with a large number of French and Belgian fishing vessels. Eleven small French ships and 3 small tugs left Cherbourg for Dover on the night 2nd-3rd June ; Le Havre was scheduled to send 8 trawlers, 2 minesweepers, 1 tug, and 20 small dinghies ; and Fécamp sent 14 trawlers. During the afternoon of the 3rd the French authorities transmitted the figure of French troops still remaining in Dunkirk. This was about 30,000, a pro- portion of whom belonged to other than combatant units. The total capacity of the lifting force, if used to the full, was 30,000, but this was about 5,000 more than the facilities within the port would permit of being embarked in 4 hours, even if the French troops moved with the greatest rapidity at all points of embarkation. On previous occasions there had been some instances of difficulty in persuading French troops to embark otherwise than as complete units. Vice-Admiral Ramsay consequently impressed on the French liaison officers the necessity of speed, and he added a number of French officers and ratings to the augmented pier parties which were despatched to Dunkirk at 2200, in I The following ships landed troops in England on 4th June (numbers landed in brackets) British - destroyers Express (611), Malcolm (736), Sabre (592), Shikari (383), Vanquisher Minesweepers Albury (400), Halcyon (501), Kellett (30), Leda (500), Medway Queen (266), ferred to trawler off Dunkirk on account of collision damage) Gunboat Locust (196) (414), Venomous (1200), Whitshed (444); Corvettes Guillemot (460), Kingfisher (200, trans- Princess Elizabeth (329), Queen of Thanet (150), Speedwell (396) Trawler Saturn (418) Drifters Forecast (123), "L.H.W.D." (90) Skoots Bornrif (96), Hondsrug (308), Pascholl (255), Ruja (300) ; Yacht Gulzar (140) ; Personnel vessels Autocarrier (712), Canterbury Princess (659), Côte d'Argent (1349), King George V (817), Lady of Mann (1244), Newhaven (729), (1350), Tynwald (3000) ; Tugs Racia (123), Sun XV (37) War Dept. M.Ls. Maud (1270), Royal Sovereign (took the place of Manxman which refused to sail) Pigeon (23), Swallow (23) ; Sailing Barge Beatrice Maud (31), Tanga not reach England until 5th and June) launches (260) ; R.N.L.I. lifeboats Edward Z. Dresden (50), Greater (did London (48) ; Motor boats Nayland Bonny Heather (210), Diana Mary (28), Elizabeth Green (10), Meuse (50), Coliath trawlers (355), 3 patrol vessels (836), 13 trawlers and M.F.Vs. (1416), 1104. Belgian Tug 3 M/S (55), Walker II (76). French 5 Torpedo boats 2 S/M chasers (127), (183), 5 trawlers (554). 114
INDEX Lord Southborough, 60, 69, 83. Lorina, sunk, 45. Louise-Irene, 73n. Louise Marie, 62n. Lucian Gougy, 107n. Lusyne, Capt. P., 116. Lutteur, 62. Lydd, 28n, 36-7, 44, 52, 100-1, 103. Lydie-Susanne, 73. M.41, 73n. McClelland, Lt. Cdr. J. W., 59n, 75-7 (work at La Panne). McCullough, Lt. Cdr., 59n. Mackay, 20n, 27, 35-6 (put out of action). MacKewn, Lt. A. R., R.N.R., takes over St. Seriol, 48. McRea, Lt. H. C. J., 37. Maid of Orleans, 16-17, 22n, 24, 31n, 54n, 87 (damaged), 127. Mainwaring, Lt. A. H., killed, 93. Ma Joie, 60n. Malabar, 85. Malcolm, 28n, 54n, 55, 62 (makes two trips on 30th May), 83 (collides with Dunkirk pier), 109 (sent back empty), 112n, 114n, 116, 118. Malden Annie IV, abandoned, 72. Malet, Pilote, 73. Malines, 29n, 37. Mallard, 34, 99, 104. Mallow, 88. Malo, see Beaches. Manxman, 29n, 54n, 102, 114n. March, Mr. F. J., 47. Maréchal Foch, sunk, 116. Maretta, damaged, 13. Margaux, 73. Marie, 74. Marlborough, 72n. Marmion, 28n, 54n, 100-1, 107n, 109. Marrack, Capt. H. R., 74. Marsayru, adventures of, 72-3. Mary Rose, sunk, 72. Mary Scott, 100. M.A./S.B.6, 52 (sinks Minikoi), 66-7 (takes Lord Gort to Dover), 75. M.A./S.B.7, 111-112 (in operation CK.). LA./S.B,10, 101-2, 108, 119. Massey Shaw, 119. Maund, Cdr. G. O., speeds up embarkation, 63-64; leads ships into Dunkirk, 101. Medical Parties, sent across, 49. Medway Queen, 23n, 27, 31, 100-1, 105, 107n, 109, 114n. Merchant Navy, see Civilians. Mermaiden, 72n. Meuse, 114n. M.F.H., 72n. Michael Stevens, 107n. Midas, 23n, 107n. Mines and mining, British, 34; German, 38, 93, 110; French, 62-3. Minikoi, sunk 52. Ministry of Sea Transport, 21. Ministry of Shipping, 5. Minotaur, 72n. Mirasol, 53. Mistral, 39, 40n, 41 (damaged), 43. Monarda, 71n. Mona's Isle, 16, 19. Mona's Queen, 16, 28, 31n, 38 (sunk). Montgomery, Maj.-Gen. B. L., 2, 75, 77 (embarks). Morrison, P. O., 72. Montrose, 20n, 27, 32n, 36 (put out of action). 202
PLAN 1 Soate of Miles 10 5 o 10 20 30 40 N The German break-through on 17th.18th KENT OSTEND ANTWERP DUNKIRK LA PANNE NIEUPORT BRUGES 18th MAY may 13th MAY ON MAPS IN LORD CORTS DESPATCH R.M. FURNES Yser GAND MALINES GRAVELINES a BERGUES CALAIS SPYKE RIYS R.Senna ALOST WORMHOUTE th F. LOUVAIN YPRES 18MAY Phyle WATTEN COURTRAI MENIN Escaut BRUSSELS 13th MAY CASSEL COMINES BOULOGNE StOMER R.Dendre WAVRE HAZEBROUCK ARMENTIERES P.LYS AIRE MERVILLE LILLE ATH R.Meuse EXOLISH NAMUR StAMAND LA BASSEE R.Sambre VALE CIENNES DOUAI Fscaut RRA R. 18th MAY 18thMAY 13th:MAY CAMBRAI DOULLENS ABBEVILLE R 2.50mm ALBERT DIEPPE PERONNE AMIENS st QUENTINE 18th MAY MEZIERES SEDAN R.Oire Approximiste BritishFrenchead Belgiadine on 13ᵗʰ May: R.Aisne " " " 18th " : German break break-through shewn in blue RMass TSD/HS (655) C.B.H. 16675- Wt.41534 Dd. -625-6/49
PLAN 2 Scale ofMiles to 5 o 10 20 30 40 N The Allied withdrawal into 18th MAY the Dunkirk KENT GSTEND . 30ᵗMAY BRUGES ANTWERP PANNE perimeter on the + NIEUPORT 23rd MAY 30th May May + 4. FURNES MALINES Yser GAND BASED ON MAPS IN LORD GORT'S DESPATCH LINES C GRAVE STATES BERGUES R.Lys ALOST R WORMHOUTE LOUVAIN CHANNEL YPRES COURTRAI Escant R.Dyle WATTE MENIN BRUSSELS . R St. OMER CASSEL COMINES Dandre WAVRE BOULDONE . ZEBROUCK INS ARMENTIERES R. R AIRE MERVILLE ATH LILLE 23rd:MAY Meuse 23rd MAY St. AMAND NAMUR . BASSEE CARVIN . 18th MAY R. Sambre St.POL . VALENCIENNES DOUAI BARRAS Escaut a CAMBRAI OULLENS BEVILLE B ALBERT R.Somme PERONNE him AMIENS StQUENTIN French 10th Arm MEZIERES SEDAN R.Oise Mause The Dunkirk Perimeter on 30th May. Allied line on 18th Щау French 3rd Army R.Aisne Approximate British, French and Belgiantine on 23rd May German progress shewn in blue TSD/HS (ESG) C.B.H.16675
PLAN 2 Scale ofMiles to 5 o 10 20 30 40 & The Allied withdrawal into 18th MAY the Dunkirk KENT GSTEND 30thmay BRUGES ANTWERP PANNE perimeter on the NIEUPORT 23rd MAY + 30th May May + + x FURNES GAND MALINES LINES Yser BASED ON MAPS IN LORD GORT'S DESPATCH C SAYKER BERGUES R.Lys ALOST a WORMHOUTE LOUVAIN CHANNEL YPRES COURTRAI R.Dyle WATTE MENIN BRUSSELS . R St. OMER CASSEL COMINES WAVRE BOULDONE . Dandre ZEBROUCK IVS ARMENTIERES R. AIRE LALT MERVILLE ATH LILLE 23rd:MAY Meuse 23rd MAY . St. AMAND NAMUR BASSEE CARVIN . 18th MAY R Sambre St.POL VALENCIENNES DOUAI ARRAS R.Escaut CAMBRAI DOULLENS BEVILLE B ALBERT Somme PERONNE AMIENS him St.QUENTIN French 10th Army MEDIERES SEDAN R.Oise RMause The Dunkirk Perimeter on 30th May Allied line on 18th Щау French 3rd Army R.Aisne Approximate British, French and Belgiantine on 23rd May German progress shown in blue TSD/HS (E56) C.B.H.16675
Source: The National Archives, Kew, MT 40 36. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
| CHALUTIER | MEUSE (Belgian Launch) |
Movements recorded for Meuse during the evacuation period, as plotted on the Operation Dynamo map.
No reviewed movement log is currently published for this vessel.
Log in to suggest an evidence-backed edit or a new movement log.